Isaac Cockfield
The CFO
Send me an email
isaac.cockfield@lpl.com
Call me
678-662-7036
Visit my website
https://thecfoadvisors.com
Zack started in the financial services industry in 1999 at Merrill Lynch and has worked with many of the same clients for 20 plus years. In 2003, Zack earned the Certified Financial Planner® designation and can meet over Zoom to do an intro meeting.
Is September Seasonality a Headwind for Stocks?
Much as September is dreaded by many students as it’s time for back-to-school, this month is also not well-liked by many equity investors with an eye for seasonal patterns as, much like its start this year, September has historically been a poor month for equity markets. Markets traded down (S&P 500 shed over 2%) on the first trading day of September yesterday with the worst daily performance since the start of August, as concerns about global growth came to the fore among market participants. Today, we examine in more detail how September has typically fared from a seasonality perspective.
Since 1950, the S&P 500 has generated an average return of -0.7% in September, making it the worst month for stocks on an average return basis. The last four Septembers have also been notably weak, with the index posting declines of 4.9%, 9.3%, 4.8%, and 3.9%, contributing to an average decline of -4.2% over the past five-year period. September has the worst monthly return over this period, and also over the past 10- and 20-year periods. It is also the only month that exhibits negative returns over each of these periods.
September Seasonals Have Been a Headwind Especially in Recent Years
S&P 500 Index Average Monthly Returns (1950–2024)
Source: LPL Research, FactSet, Bloomberg 8/30/24 (1950–current)
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The modern design of the S&P 500 Index was first launched in 1957. Performance before then incorporates the performance of its predecessor index, the S&P 90.
While this hasn’t been the pattern at the start of September this year, on average since 1950 during the month, stocks tend to trade sideways during the first half of the month, with losses beginning to accumulate towards month’s end. For this year, the midway point also happens to line up closely with the September 18 Federal Open Market Committee Meeting (FOMC) which could be a catalyst for increased volatility, especially if the Federal Reserve (Fed) decision doesn’t meet market expectations (currently futures markets price the probability of a 25 basis point (0.25%) cut at this meeting at around 60%, and a larger 50 basis point (0.25%) cut at around 40%). We examined “What Does a Rate Cut Mean for Stocks and Bonds” and why we think the markets may be pricing in too many rate cuts in our blogs last week.
Poor September Performance Has Typically Been Backloaded
S&P 500 September Daily Progression (1950–2023)
Source: LPL Research, FactSet, Bloomberg 8/30/24 (1950– current)
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The modern design of the S&P 500 Index was first launched in 1957. Performance before then incorporates the performance of its predecessor index, the S&P 90.
Analyzing the data by the proportion of positive monthly returns doesn’t improve the seasonal outlook for September, as it is the month with the lowest proportion, by some distance, of positive monthly returns. September is the only month since 1950, that has finished positive less than half of the time.
September Has a Considerably Lower Proportion of Positive Monthly Returns
S&P 500 Index Percentage of Positive Monthly Returns (1950–current)
Source: LPL Research, FactSet, Bloomberg 8/30/24 (1950–current)
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The modern design of the S&P 500 Index was first launched in 1957. Performance before then incorporates the performance of its predecessor index, the S&P 90.
Before we send September straight to the metaphorical principals office for poor performance, there are a couple of potentially redeeming features for September 2024. In years when stocks have been up year to date by the end of August (50 of the last 73 years, and as they have been this year), then September has actually been marginally positive (0.1%) on average. September in years where markets have been down year to date follows that trend and exhibits an average loss of 2.8%. Additionally, in presidential election years, September’s average returns have been slightly better, losing 0.4% compared to a loss double that size in non-presidential election years. The percentage of positive monthly equity returns in September also slightly improve to around a coin-toss (50%) in both presidential election years and years with positive year-to-date returns.
Considering seasonality past September, the outlook does improve considerably. The two-month period from October to November is the strongest over the past five and ten years, and second-strongest over the past 20 years, and all periods back to 1950. November is the strongest month based on data to 1950, with December second; as it’s no surprise that November-December is the strongest two-month period over that time frame. The fourth quarter is also the strongest quarter for stock market returns over all the periods studied (including an impressive 9.8% average quarterly gain over the past five years). In presidential election years, only the fourth quarter trails the second quarter (+2.8%) as the strongest, but still posts an impressive 2.5% average gain. A caveat to the improved seasonality past September is that in presidential election years, stocks have also been down in October (-0.9%) as uncertainty over upcoming election results has often spooked markets (compared with October in other non-presidential election years with an average +1.5% return). Presidential election year progression of returns sees stocks peak around the third week in August then bottoming around a week before the election (losing 2.4% on average in the process), before ending the year strong after the election is in the rear-view mirror.
Stocks Have on Average Bottom Around a Week Before Presidential Elections
S&P 500 Index Daily Progression (1950–2024)
Source: LPL Research, FactSet, Bloomberg 8/30/24 (1950– current)
First 250 trading days of the year presented; actual number of trading days has ranged from 250 to 254.
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The modern design of the S&P 500 Index was first launched in 1957. Performance before then incorporates the performance of its predecessor index, the S&P 90.
Summary
September seasonality is generally not favorable to stocks, with poor performance typically backloaded, but there may be some slightly mitigating factors at play in the year. Much of the likely trajectory for stocks will depend on the path that the Fed decides to take at the FOMC meeting that takes place right at the start of the historically weak period for stocks in September. LPL’s Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation Committee (STAAC) maintains its tactical neutral stance on equities, though we don’t rule out the possibility of short-term weakness as markets could readjust having gotten slightly over their skis on the pace and number of rate cuts that the Fed will deliver. Scanning out further, both post-election and fourth quarter seasonality become more favorable stocks.
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.
Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.
Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.
Asset Class Disclosures –
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.
Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.
Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.
Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.
Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.
Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.
High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.
Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.
The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor’s holdings.
Securities and advisory services offered through LPL Financial, a registered investment advisor and broker-dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC.
Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value
For Public Use – Tracking: #623915
George Smith
George Smith chairs the Tactical Model Portfolio Committee, which manages LPL Financial’s multi-asset models across multiple managed account platforms.